Author: Developer

Client stopped at 1:45 a.m. for speeding. Police officer detects odor of alcohol and client’s eyes to be bloodshot and glassy. Client subsequently fails four standardized field sobriety tests. Defense excludes evidence or reference to two tests including single preliminary breath test of .16 BAC. Defense challenges relationship between the remaining balance/coordination tests and a person’s ability to drive a car safely. Defense establishes that client exhibited good control over the vehicle despite the excessive speed. Not Guilty following jury trial.

Police respond to report of vehicle striking toll booth barrier at slow speed. Driver speaks limited English but is able to complete some field sobriety tests including the one legged stand which he does perfectly. After arrest implied consent rights for breath test explained to driver via international long distance operator utilizing speaker phone. Driver submits to breath test with .15 BAC. Defense excludes breath test results for lack of foundation that implied consent law followed (without international operator available as witness government cannot submit results). Not guilty verdict following trial.

Police respond to scene of two car accident at intersection controlled by traffic light at 5:00 p.m. Defendant admits that she missed red light and that she had two beers at lunch hours earlier but nothing to drink since then. Police detect odor of alcohol, red, glassy eyes and slurred speech. Field sobriety testing takes place on side of busy main road in town center. Police further allege driver using asthma inhaler as “cover-up” to conceal odor of alcohol in car and on her breath. Defense offers evidence that defendant’s asthma brought on by stress of accident. Defense witnesses establish driver’s sobriety and lack of alcohol consumption for several hours before accident. Not guilty verdict following trial.

Police responding to report of domestic disturbance where female is reportedly highly intoxicated and leaving the scene in a black pick up truck. One police officer en route radios a second officer en route to stop a different vehicle because he thinks it contains the female party reportedly involved in the domestic. Police stop the car not matching the description given by 911 caller. Driver charged with OUI. The Officer that recognized the driver does not appear for hearing on defense Motion to Suppress. His statements to second Officer must be excluded because exception to hearsay rule would violate defendant’s right to confrontation under Sixth Amendment and recent U.S. Supreme Court decision. Motion To Suppress allowed. OUI charge dismissed.

Immigrant driver is stopped for Driving After Revocation for DWI facing mandatory jail term. Suspension is the result of earlier plea to DWI charge that occurred without the benefit of counsel or native language interpreter. Defense challenges earlier DWI conviction on grounds that it is not the result of a voluntary and knowing waiver of constitutional rights. DWI conviction vacated and new trial ordered, mandatory jail sentence and further suspension on new charge avoided.

Defense challenges accuracy and reliability of .09 breath test and validity of field sobriety testing. Driver stopped by police for entering rotary from fast food restaurant without headlights on. Driver admits to officer that he consumed “4-5 beers and a Fenway Frank.” Defense cross exam of breath test machine operator focused on limitations of infrared breath testing and indirect relationship to true blood alcohol levels. Not Guilty verdict following jury trial.

Driver stopped by police for broken license plate light. Police officer notes slurred speech, odor of alcohol, difficulty exiting car and following directions. Driver’s refusal of field sobriety tests and breath test admissible against him at trial. Officer testifies that driver was exhibited mood swings, including being apologetic then angry, finally displaying his middle finger to the arresting officer throughout booking. Defense focuses on safe operation and attitude of diver consistent with wrongly accused person. Not Guilty verdict following jury trial.

Driver stopped by police for stop line violation. Officer notes odor of alcohol, nervous demeanor and an admission to drinking earlier in the evening. Client submits to battery of field sobriety tests, some of which the police record as the “satisfactory” and others as “deficient”. Defense contends client performed extremely well on all field sobriety tests and that the admission to earlier consumption with an odor of alcohol are not enough evidence to prove impairment beyond reasonable doubt. DWI charge dismissed.

Client found by police sleeping in car just off roadway with one wheel on public way, engine shut off, keys on floorboard with two open bottles of alcohol. Police testify that they wake client and she then miserably fails all field sobriety tests and is unable to recite the correct date, time or her present location. Defense stipulates to intoxication and argues government lacks evidence to prove operation or establish when the client consumed the alcohol in relation to the last operation of the car. Not guilty verdict following trial.

Client passes marked cruiser in opposite direction going 51 m.p.h. in 30 m.p.h. zone. Police turn and eventually catch up to client who is now in the parking lot of a fast food establishment urinating outside of his car. Police note odor of alcohol, admission to drinking, and red, glassy eyes. Defense challenges validity and importance of field sobriety tests, the relevance of defendant’s refusal of a breath test and public urination to safe operation of car. Jury reports deadlock at 11-1. Defense weighs options including possible mistrial and re-trial and then waives right to unanimous verdict and agrees to accept 11 juror verdict regardless of outcome. Not guilty verdict following trial.