Author: Developer

Client passes marked cruiser in opposite direction going 51 m.p.h. in 30 m.p.h. zone. Police turn and eventually catch up to client who is now in the parking lot of a fast food establishment urinating outside of his car. Police note odor of alcohol, admission to drinking, and red, glassy eyes. Defense challenges validity and importance of field sobriety tests, the relevance of defendant’s refusal of a breath test and public urination to safe operation of car. Jury reports deadlock at 11-1. Defense weighs options including possible mistrial and re-trial and then waives right to unanimous verdict and agrees to accept 11 juror verdict regardless of outcome. Not guilty verdict following trial.

Driver stopped by police for stop line violation. Officer notes odor of alcohol, nervous demeanor and an admission to drinking earlier in the evening. Client submits to battery of field sobriety tests, some of which the police record as the “satisfactory” and others as “deficient”. Defense contends client performed extremely well on all field sobriety tests and that the admission to earlier consumption with an odor of alcohol are not enough evidence to prove impairment beyond reasonable doubt. DWI charge dismissed.

Police respond to report of one car accident with property damage. Driver and vehicle have left the scene before police arrive. Neighbors direct police to driveway short distance away where damaged vehicle is parked. Alleged driver is one of several people at the home. Only evidence of operation is a hesitant admission by the defendant that she was the driver. Prosecution lacks evidence to corroborate admission and prove operation beyond reasonable doubt. Defense prevails on Motion for Required Finding of Not Guilty.

Defense wins Motion to Suppress in 2003 before District Court challenging motor vehicle stop based on anonymous cell phone tip where police do not independently corroborate report of alleged erratic operation. State appeals to NH Supreme Court. Supreme Court decides case by remanding matter back to District Court with benefit of opinion creating “new analytical framework” to test police stops based on anonymous phone tips in DWI cases. Defense wins Motion to Suppress second time under new law created by Supreme Court opinion.

Driver stopped for speeding and admits to officer that she recently consumed a drink. Exit order and field sobriety tests follow. Driver informs officer that she sustained serious leg fractures requiring multiple surgeries and placement of orthopedic hardware which still impairs her balance and causes substantial pain. Police proceed with field sobriety testing which driver cannot complete. DWI Charge Dismissed in light of subsequently documented medical history and disability.

Driver takes wrong turn down poorly marked one way street. Police approach head on and stop vehicle. Driver ordered to exit and submit to field sobriety testing when he admits to consuming “a few” beers earlier in the evening. Location is busy roadway on slight grade which may adversely affect outcome of standard tests. Officers do not complete their “most accurate” Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test. DWI Charge Dismissed.

Driver stopped on outstanding arrest warrant. Police notice odor of freshly burnt marijuana emanating from vehicle and driver and find small amount of drug in door panel pocket. Police allege driver is lethargic with glassy, red, bloodshot eyes. Arresting officers are not “drug recognition experts” certified in drugged driving detection or special validated field testing for this purpose. OUI Drugs charge dismissed due to lack of evidence of erratic operation and lack of expert testimony.

Driver involved in minor traffic accident after leaving friends house where she watched football but consumed no alcohol. Police allege odor of alcohol and poor performance on field sobriety tests and arrest driver for DWI. Driver refuses to submit to breath test over concerns that her inhaler medication may affect results. Driving privileges suspended for six (6) months. Defense requests hearing on this administrative suspension and appears with witnesses to challenge all aspects of suspension. Arresting Officer fails to appear, suspension vacated, driving privileges restored.

Client is driving a close friend and another acquaintance. Friend is highly intoxicated and opens door of pickup truck without warning, falls to street and suffers life threatening injuries. Due to rural, secluded location client attempts to drive friend to hospital but is stopped by responding police and removed from vehicle at gun-point. After friend is transported to hospital by med flight, client admits to police that he drank “one beer”. Police allege client failed field sobriety tests and charge him with OUI Causing Serious Bodily Injury. Defense obtains directed verdict on Serious Bodily Injury element as there is no evidence that defendant caused victim to fall from truck. Jury returns not guilty verdict on remaining OUI charge.

Police respond to one car accident and find car flipped over snow bank resting on its roof. Client admits to driving vehicle and consuming three beers at local bar, but can’t recall location or name of bar and appears confused. Defense excludes admissions in Motion to Suppress. Defense contends that client’s demeanor and unsteadiness due to injuries from crash. Client found not guilty following trial.